On 13 November 2013 17:39, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Though since we're talking about it, the one stop gap fix that would >> make me happy would be if all Ubuntu Developers could trigger the >> equivalent of the local 'requeue_package.py --full' command that UDD >> admins can run. Some history might get lost, but at least out of date >> branches could be made usable. > > This seems to have been the topic that has generated the most > interest. It seems to be a bit of an overkill to have a vUDS session > on it, especially if we don't have the right people in the room. So > maybe we can try to hammer out the requirements here? > > Currently you need shell access to Jubany in order to run the command. > [0] I know that this request has come up in the past, but my Google-fu > is failing me now. Adding the (seemingly dormant) UDD list to the > conversation in hopes of catching the right person. > > [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/udd/+bug/713719
I requeue packages from time to time, upon request. But I don't keep a track of packages for which full requeue doesn't help. Nor have a good way to process such requests. Maybe a request wiki page? I'd subscribe to it, and would comment which one requeued and whether that fixes / not fixes the branch. Regards, Dmitrijs. -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
