On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 05:15:41PM -0600, C de-Avillez wrote: > Although I am probably hammering a rather cold iron, I still fail to > understand why ntp is not installed by default. I would expect precise > timekeeping to be something important on a server (instead of allowing > the time to drift slowly).
Right now, ntpdate is seeded in platform.trusty/minimal. I only see ntp itself in server-ship, so we end up with ntpdate installed without ntp as standard everywhere. I recently filed http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731352. There, I'm told that ntpdate on its own (without ntpd) is deprecated. So should we be installing ntpdate by default without ntp at all via the minimal seed? If so, then I'd like to have ntpdate use the DHCP ntp-server option if it is available, as I've described in that bug, to fix a MAAS issue on hardware where an RTC isn't available. It looks like this functionality has been there a while, but has not been enabled in the case where ntp isn't installed, but ntpdate is, which is the common case. I thought that it might be worth considering this at the same time as Carlos' case. So: 1) Is using ntpdate without ntp the right approach; and 2) will treating NTPDATE_USE_NTP_CONF as no if ntp.conf doesn't exist (or otherwise changing behaviour to make the if-up.d hook fix the system time) break anything? Robie
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
