On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:29:04PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 05:08:36PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > > Apport has actually done that for a long time, and mark these crash > > reports with "UnreportableReason". Almost all of the unreportable ones > > get uploaded to errors anyway (I'm not particularly happy about that, > > but that's the status quo), but we specifically blacklist the ones for > > this case (i. e. "binary upgraded underneath you"). Is that broken? > > I. e. do you have an example where this actually did get sent to > > errors.u.c.? We should fix that ASAP then. > > No, I dont have any firm proof of that. I sometimes saw "the" resolved > stacktraces where the linenumbers were off for the version of the source I was > looking at -- but then again this has to be expected when there are different > versions affected by the same crash (Im blissfully ignorant about how apport > matches those as "the same" though anyway).
I'm interested in seeing an example of the problem. -- Brian Murray -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
