We will get this tested with touch and landed as soon as possible. Pat
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:13 AM, David Barth <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 30/05/2014 14:20, David Barth a écrit : > > Le 30/05/2014 12:41, Olivier Tilloy a écrit : >> >>> (cc’ing David and Alex who may want to comment) >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Olivier Tilloy < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Dmitry Shachnev <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I would very much like to update qtwebkit-opensource-src to version >>>>> 5.2.0. It blocks syncs of other packages, like pyqt5, >>>>> qtsensors-opensource-src and qtscript-opensource-src. It is also a >>>>> prerequisite for updating Qt itself to version 5.3 (as qttools now >>>>> depends on qtwebkit). >>>>> >>>>> According to Timo in >>>>> >>>>> https://code.launchpad.net/~mitya57/kubuntu-packaging/ >>>>> qtwebkit-merge-with-debian/+merge/216539 >>>>> : >>>>> >>>>> This looks it'd be great to have so I'm planning to build this for >>>>>> >>>>> testing in addition to qtbase >>>>> >>>>>> and qtdeclarative when U opens, but we need to check with webapps >>>>>> >>>>> people (= dbarth, >>>>> >>>>>> alex-abreu) on how they see this. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not clear on what's the schedule for full Oxide moving. In >>>>>> addition >>>>>> >>>>> to touch also desktop >>>>> >>>>>> is currently including libqt5webkit5 in default install still (checked >>>>>> >>>>> with seeded-in-ubuntu >>>>> >>>>>> qtwebkit-opensource-src). >>>>>> >>>>> Does anybody know when it will be possible to upload this? >>>>> >>>>> I do not want to break Touch stuff, but I am already waiting for more >>>>> than a month and don't want to wait more. >>>>> >>>>> As far as webbrowser-app is concerned, the transition to oxide is >>>> complete. The webapp-container still has a dependency on QtWebKit >>>> though, >>>> to catter for legacy webapps that use the 13.10 framework, as pointed >>>> out >>>> by Timo in the MR. >>>> >>>> I’d say all that’s needed is to thoroughly test existing webapps that >>>> still use QtWebKit. Is there a PPA we can use to test this new version? >>>> >>> I don't think we can realistically test all of them properly. This is >> really the responsibility of the app developers. >> >> Rather, it means that our temporary support for webapps using the 13.10 >> framework needs to end. >> >> We had already started warning developers about it >> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~click-reviewers/click-reviewers-tools/trunk/ >> revision/189 <http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eclick-reviewers/click- >> reviewers-tools/trunk/revision/189> last month. >> >> Now is the time to announce the end of support for the old runtime. >> > I have posted a warning on the app developer list ([ubuntu-phone]), and > from preliminary testing of apps switched to oxide I don't see any apparent > issues. > > In other words, don't block on webapp support. We will land a fix to > switch all apps to Oxide, to go along with the qtwebkit upload. > > > David > > -- > ubuntu-devel mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/ > mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel >
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
