Didier Roche [2015-08-12 12:29 +0200]: > Le 12/08/2015 12:15, Martin Pitt a écrit : > >Sebastien Bacher [2015-08-12 12:03 +0200]: > >>Did anyone measure what difference with/without the png optimizer would > >>make on the iso/standard install? Without numbers we can't really decide > >>on the cost/benefit... > >Back on natty it was ~ 5.5 MB (compressed size) gain with compressing > >PNGs and 7 MB with compressing SVGs. > > > > > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/performance-desktop-n-install-footprint > > > >There is no reason to believe that the numbers would be dramatically > >different these days, i. e. you can expect a 10 to 15 MB gain on a > >desktop ISO from this. > > > >Martin > > Is that only iso/image size (so recompressed in the squashfs) or the gain of > an ubuntu install itself, on disk?
As I said, "compressed size", i. e. squashfs/deb difference. PNGs are already compressed so don't make much difference on an install; SVGs will get quite a bit bigger uncompressed (but I don't have any numbers). Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) -- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
