On 10/23/2015 11:10 AM, Robie Basak wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:06:34AM -0500, Jamie Strandboge wrote: >> On 10/23/2015 10:45 AM, Robie Basak wrote: >> >>> (This is for an unconfined app - I think some changes will be needed to >>> the AppArmor profile definitions to make it work confined - for example >>> push notification helpers are too confined to allow one written in >>> Python to run currently, despite the what documentation examples do). >>> >> Please file bugs[1] on specifics. AIUI, there are already several python push >> helpers. > > I didn't file a bug at the time because there was a comment in the > AppArmor profile definition (supplied by easyprof IIRC) that said that > Python was specifically not supported. Although I was following the SDK > documentation example, I was still getting an AppArmor denial, even > using identical code to the example. > > Perhaps this has changed now, or the release on my phone mismatched the > documentation I was using? > It depends on the template and policy group if that comment is in it. It seems I misremembered though-- looking at the policy, python isn't allowed for push clients since it isn't specifically supported. You can always bundle the interpreter if you want, but that is pretty heavyweight for a push helper but is allowed for an app.
This is the direction snappy is going too, but in snappy there is a tool to help with bundling (snapcraft). -- Jamie Strandboge http://www.ubuntu.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
