On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 11:20:53AM +0100, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 09.02.2018, 09:37 +0000 schrieb Robie Basak:
> > Should this be a side effect subject to change of store policy
> > (which I think is outside the scope of the Ubuntu project?), or
> > should we define "no devmode" as an Ubuntu policy now?
> 
> this is an already existing store policy ... if your snap was built
> with "confinement: devmode" you can not release it to stable, the store
> checks this and blocks. so the "only stable" policy on the ubuntu side
> should be enough.

Regardless of the question of governance of that policy, there's also
the fact that the spec calls for following a per-series channel, for
which I don't think a "no devmode" store policy is currently configured.

-- 
Colin Watson                                       [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Reply via email to