On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:35:07PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hello all, > > Iain Lane [2018-02-16 11:52 +0000]: > > > I wouldn't pick on any of these: network-online.target is a sloppily > > > defined > > > shim for SysV init backwards compatibility, and may not ever get started > > > (in > > > fact, that's the goal ☺); and the container might not use networkd, so I > > > wouldn't use s-n-wait-online either. I think querying > > > > Interesting. I thought that it was the systemd way to say 'I am online > > now' --- i.e. nm-online or systemd-networkd-wait-online, which is the > > question I wanted to get a positive answer to. I can see that the SysV > > implementation isn't great, but it's not clear to me that it was ill > > defined for this case. > > "ill defined" is too strong, but it's "sloppy", just as the mere question of > what "the network is up" means in a world of dynamic interfaces, proxies, > VPNs, > dynamic resolvers, etc. > > > > [ -n "$(ip route show to 0/0)" ] > > > > This is better though, and works too. Please take a look at the attached > > patch. Thanks! :-) > > Cheers! I reworked it a bit, applied the same strategy to LXC (which is > equally affected), tested it, and landed > > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/autopkgtest/autopkgtest.git/commit/?id=20f479254
Aren't _all_ types of testbed affected by this in some way or another?
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel