On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 09:29:55AM +0200, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
> Now, all this was pushed to ubuntu-dev-tools as a way to get more eyes
> and more use -- so when you see things you disagree with, it's
> absolutely fine for you to go ahead and fix the code. :)

If that was your goal, then I'd say it would have been much nicer to do
so in a separate branch, rather than pushing a ton of code to master.

> I wasn't using
> ubuntutools because it was "not available", not really practical to use
> and keep the tree (and a snap) to use as few dependencies as possible

You are talking about a tool to be used by ubuntu developers.  Asking
for python3-ubuntutools to be installed is entirely reasonable, and I
doubt you'll find anybody buying the "as few dependencies as possible"
argument in this context...

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
ubuntu-devel mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel

Reply via email to