On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 11:02, Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I've spend today working on +1 maintenance > (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PlusOneMaintenanceTeam, > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PlusOneMaintenanceTeam/Status). > > We have a few transitions ongoing (gsl, hdf5, perl, ...) which are showing > signs of all getting entangled together. > > I re-uploaded haskell-hmatrix-gsl which had been uploaded too early (before > gsl has been published on riscv64). It built fine. > > I found some more blockers for the gsl transition: > https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/html/auto-gsl.html. > The cpl-* ones are semi-typical mysterious failures for a new port, probably > down to bugs in our emulated builders. The ea-utils one is a bit of a mess > though, in some ways: it should never have built in the first place! There is > a package (pegjs) in focal and groovy release that Provides: nodejs. This > means that things that transitively build-depend on nodejs don't end up in > depwait like they should. There is a pegjs in groovy proposed that fixes > this, I guess it needs to be forced to migrate and any binaries this makes > uninstallable removed (it's not like packages which depend on nodejs and are > erroneously installable are actually going to _work_). >
That's a nice triange of nodejs / pegjs. Did you open an RM bug report against pegjs, and subscribe ~ubuntu-archive to it, such that they can process the binary-only removal on riscv64? As documented at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/PackageArchive#Removing_Packages > I fixed pbsuite's autopkgtest and sent a patch off to Debian, this has > migrated and been applied to the Debian repo already. > > I looked at the pbcopper ftbfs on armhf and ppc64el. Debian has a report > about the armhf failure and the packaging repo on salsa already has changes > to disable the build on 32 bit architectures so I guess we should follow > that. The ppc64el failure was strange and I spent probably too long coming to > the conclusion that it's a bug in the "simde" header library Debian uses to > compile the x86-intrinsic-using code on other architectures: > https://github.com/nemequ/simde/issues/325. I've uploaded a workaround and > sent it to Debian. > > I'm doing this again tomorrow, I expect I'll mostly keep on picking at > proposed migration. > > Cheers, > mwh > > -- > ubuntu-devel mailing list > ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel -- Regards, Dimitri. -- Regards, Dimitri. -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
