On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 06:07:09PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote: > Over the last few weeks, I've been working on rebasing our extensive > delta to proposed-migration. It's now at a state where it's ready for > others to take a look at. Please check out the output from a dry-run > (being re-run hourly from cron) > > > https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/laney/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html > > https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/laney/proposed-migration/update_output.txt
Update on this: Testing found a couple of bugs. I think I've fixed them. They were mainly around arch:all handling. In Debian, these packages are usually built on separate buildds, and britney had made a couple of assumptions that relied on this. I'm thinking that I'll make the cut over on Thursday UK time, so please have a look at the output before then and check your .yaml-parsing scripts against the new output (location changed since my initial post; it's now .xz compressed) https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/laney/proposed-migration/update_excuses.yaml.xz Cheers, -- Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ] Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ] Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubuntu.com ]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
