Hey again,
I went ahead and uploaded the basic change initially suggested. I think
it could make sense to allow flavors to divert os-release and tweak the
content according to what they want to define but it shouldn't block us
doing the first step.
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
Le 14/06/2022 à 15:06, Sebastien Bacher a écrit :
Hey,
Le 14/06/2022 à 02:09, Erich Eickmeyer a écrit :
Just chiming-in here from a Flavor Lead perspective. It seems like this
could be something that could be implemented via update-alternatives,
similar to how plymouth themes and distributor-logo and are controlled.
How are flavor handling /etc/os-release today? LOGO isn't the only
thing there they might want to set differently from Ubuntu
(pretty_name, support_url, bug_report_url are other examples).
Using alternatives for the logo here sounds like the wrong solution,
it's the os-release that should be diverted instead.
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
