Hi Graham, On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 3:11 PM Graham Inggs <gin...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > libmaus2 migration > ================== > libmaus2 no longer builds on arm64. I requested removal of the arm64 > binaries of libmaus2 and its reverse-dependency biobambam2 (which were > also removed from Debian) in LP: #2106240
Actioned by Simon Chopin already. > meep and meep-mpi-default migration > =================================== > The recent syncs of these packages stopped building on armhf. I was > about to file a bug requesting removal of the binaries, but found that > jbicha had already filed LP: #2106128 Done - removed both armhf binaries. > partclone migration > =================== > Debian stopped building partclone on big-endian architectures. I > filed LP: #2106325 requesting removal of the s390x binaries. Actioned by Simon Chopin already. > last-align migration > ==================== > Debian stopped building last-align on 32-bit architectures, so I > requested removal of the armhf binaries in LP: #2106331 Actioned by Simon Chopin already. > The new version of last-align also caused a regression in nanook, > which was removed from Debian testing. I updated LP: #2103924 > requesting removal of nanook. Thanks - RM'd nanook. But why is the bug also targeting last-align? IIUC, only nanook should be removed, right? Or am I missing something? - u -- ubuntu-devel mailing list ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
