On Feb 11, 2010, at 02:57 AM, James Westby wrote: >On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:33:27 +1100, Martin Pool <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'd like to let looms progress, but not (unless james or others feel >> differently) add them into the dependency chain for getting UDD going. > >No, we don't have to add it to the chain to get it going, but I think >it's one ingredient of having a great system.
I agree. Looms help both the developer and reviewer focus in on the parts that they really care about, and I think could help manage mostly boring bookkeeping details (such has how to play nicely in whichever patch system is being used). Looms probably aren't essential for udd, but seem very important for really fantastic (and fun!) opportunistic hacking. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
