On 01/24/2011 10:16 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Jan 24, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Micah Gersten wrote: > >> I actually wanted to add more features to debcommit like passing an >> author name. It might be easier to try to standardize on debcommit so >> that it's portable across multiple VCSs. Making bzr commit call >> --fixes also sounds good for those that strictly use bzr. > > One of the reasons why I want to improve and recommend 'bzr commit' is that > when using UDD, bzr is your front-end for most of the work. It seems jarring > to have to remember to switch to debcommit for a step. Perhaps OTOH, > debcommit should be recommended everywhere, but then, that seems jarring to > someone used to using bzr. (We already recommended dch but that doesn't seem > as bad because it doesn't really mirror a standard bzr command.) > > -Barry
Right, but debcommit is the same as with any other VCS. You run VCS foo, dch, and debcommit. <-- I wonder if debcommit is actually used like this, I know that's what it's intended for, but it would be interesting to know if it's actually used like that, especially with git. Micah -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
