On 09/02/11 06:57, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > On Di, Feb 08, 2011 at 00:26:16 (CET), Barry Warsaw wrote: >>> 1) As I understand it, most people are in favor of *not* versioning the >>> .pc directory. So that when you do "bzr branch lp:ubuntu/foo" you'll >>> get a tree with: >> >> I agree with James that 1) the .pc directory should not be versioned, and 2) >> we want to keep the property of branch-and-hack, > > +1 > >> meaning all patches are already applied in the source branch. > -1 > > You can maintain the property as well by adding a hook that applies the > patches at checkout time. (Even that hook is not strictly necessary, as > debuild will automatically apply patches at build time as necessary.) > > To me this question if patches should be applied to the branch or not > seems to be a presentation issue, which should better be handled at > presentation level.
Personally, I agree that not applying branches in the branch is the best way to work properly with the current tools available. But, there has been one good reason for applied patches in the branch given: it allows examination of the history of the actual code used to build the package, via the native tools of the Bazaar. Though, given how much it complicates simple changes to the branch, I don't think it pays off overall. Max.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
