On Mar 25, 2011, at 12:53 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >On Thursday, March 24, 2011 09:50:26 pm Martin Pool wrote: >> I'd like to see it happen. How do UDD community members feel about >> this vs bug fixing and import reliability? > >I'm not sure what bugs this would be traded off for, but I think import >reliability is paramount for broader acceptance of UDD. Unless people are >confident enough the branch will be current not to worry about double >checking, the need to double check things are up to date will be a barrier to >adoption.
I do agree with Scott that import reliability is really critical to adoption. You can't use UDD if the branch is out of date! BFBIP seems like a step after getting wide adoption of 'bzr branch' instead of 'apt-get source'. Cheers, -Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
