Question #46001 on Ubuntu Eee changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu-eee/+question/46001
Status: Answered => Open
Johan Frank is still having a problem:
Ok, I've been asking around and was about to attribute the problems to
the fact that the celeron-m doesn't actually have any hardware
speedstepping, and the scaling is somehow simulated by p4_clockmod using
throttling/idle cycles...
It seemed reasonable since I was watching roughly the same changes in
the reported current frequency regardless of whether I had battery or ac
power (i.e moving between 112 and 900 mhz), yet battery felt much
slower. If the cpu was actually speedstepping it ought to behave the
same way when having the same governor setting.
If this is the case, it would make sense to remove it completely for the
celeron based eee's?
I'll try your suggestion to see if a minimum frequency for ondemand helps
though.
--
You received this question notification because you are a member of
Ubuntu Eee Coders, which is an answer contact for Ubuntu Eee.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-eee-coders
Post to : ubuntu-eee-coders@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-eee-coders
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
