On 12/18/2014 08:25 PM, Erick Brunzell wrote: > On 12/18/2014 10:18 AM, Bruce Pieterse wrote: >> >> On 12/18/2014 01:05 PM, Ali/amjjawad wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> There was a technical problem and luckily, the release team was >>> around and it is fixed now. Alpha 1 images are coming soon and they >>> should appear here: >>> >>> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/328/builds >>> >>> I don't really need to remind you that we have only few hours to >>> test before Alpha 1 is released. >>> >>> Sorry for the short notice but that was unexpected error and our >>> team has nothing to do with it. >>> >>> Will keep you updated BUT PLEASE understand I'm +11 GMT (same goes >>> to Tim) and we might be on bed ... >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Erick Brunzell <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> On 12/17/2014 02:42 PM, Tim wrote: >>> >>> On 17/12/14 23:40, Erick Brunzell wrote: >>> >>> Just curious what's up with the pre-alpha Vivid images. >>> I ran the upgrade tests but there are no images listed >>> under Vivid Alpha 1 on the QA >>> Tracker. The latest daily images appear to be 20141215. >>> Is there a reason we've not spun new images for the 16th >>> or 17th? >>> >>> I just triggered respins, I think this will make them show >>> up under Alpha1. >>> >>> >>> About 6 hours later the Vivid daily on the QA Tracker still >>> shows 20141215 (rebuilding) and nothing yet under Alpha 1. Is >>> there a fly in the ointment? >>> >>> >>> I'll be away from the desk for several hours this AM and >>> early PM for an MRI but I should be able to push through >>> some installation tests if >>> the images are available within 10 to 12 hours. >>> >>> Lance >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-qa >>> <https://launchpad.net/%7Eubuntugnome-qa> >>> Post to : [email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]> >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-qa >>> <https://launchpad.net/%7Eubuntugnome-qa> >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards, >>> Ali/amjjawad <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad> >>> *Remember: *"All of us are smarter than any one of us." >>> >>> Ubuntu GNOME OneStopPage >>> <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGNOME/OneStopPage> >>> http://torios.org - StartUbuntu >>> <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StartUbuntu> - http://amjjawad.net >>> >>> >>> >> Thanks Ali/Tim, >> >> Additionally there also seems to be a problem refreshing bug >> descriptions under "Bugs to look for". They take longer than 5 >> minutes, sometimes a few hours or days. Although this is minor, it >> would be great to get this fixed. I'm not sure if this is just a >> minor glitch at the moment or not or if it happens on specific days. > > There's a button/link to click on at the bottom of the QA Tracker > pages to report bugs with the tracker. I went ahead and filed one for > that issue: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-qa-website/+bug/1403976 > > Lance > >> >> For instance this bug >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1403103 >> was filed two days ago in the QA tracker but hasn't been updated as >> yet and the automatic message created by ubuntuqa "This bug has been >> reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker." doesn't show either as a >> comment in the bug report. >> -- >> All the best, >> >> Bruce >> >> FSF Member 10674 / The FSF is a charity with a worldwide mission to advance >> software freedom / Join the Free Software Foundation: >> http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=10674 >> >> > Thank you! I forgot about that :|
-- All the best, Bruce FSF Member 10674 / The FSF is a charity with a worldwide mission to advance software freedom / Join the Free Software Foundation: http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=10674
-- Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
