Taken from Licensing Guidelines over at GNOME:
> You may make fair use of GNOME word marks to make true factual > statements GNOME, or to truthfully communicate that your product or > service is compatible with, designed for use with, or was designed > using, GNOME. Assertions of compatibility, design, must, of course, be > accurate. You cannot use GNOME logos or stylizations of GNOME word or > other GNOME Trademarks unless you have explicit written permission to > do so. You should not in any way state or imply that GNOME produces, > endorses, or supports your company, products, or services unless you > have explicit written permission to do so. When making fair use of a > GNOME Trademark, you should acknowledge that the GNOME Foundation owns > the trademark. The following language is appropriate: “The GNOME logo > and GNOME name are registered trademarks or trademarks of GNOME > Foundation in the United States or other countries.” One of the many things one learns in a design school is to make appropriate design decisions and using somebody else's logo in their own is not one of them. As I stated before, the proper reasoning and design choices made will be presented to everyone after I will have more time. This was just to show that we are not just lurking in the shadows doing nothing. Take care. V Streda, 29. apríl 2015 o 02:25 +0200, Alfredo Hernández napísal(a): > We've talked a lot about this and the GNOME foot is so specific that > is becomes almost impossible to create something that reminds the > shape whilst being unique; the GNOME foot is not abstract as other DE > logos are and we have to deal with that. > > I personally think that the concept Patrik has created is gorgeous and > can definitely tell our story. We are what Ubuntu might have become if > Unity hadn't been created, we are Ubuntu, but with GNOME. The G shape > formed from Us is very, very clever and hard to beat. > > Cheers, > Alfredo > > > On 29 Apr 2015 1:11 am, "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I do like it, very clean. But does it maybe stray too far from > the original GNOME logo? I can't really see the connection. > > I like what Ubuntu MATE did with their logo. > https://ubuntu-mate.org/ > > Just my two cents, feel free to ignore me and keep doing your > thing :) It is a really good design. > Leo > > > > > On 28/04/15 23:09, Patrik Bubák wrote: > > > > > Many of you have been wondering about the progress of the > > artwork team here at Ubuntu GNOME. We presented you with the > > new website layout in the past weeks and now we're ready to > > unveil the first concept of the new branding for Ubuntu > > GNOME. > > > > To view the concept visit this link > > > > Please note it is a work in progress and more information is > > to be disclosed soon. > > > > I will currently be away for a few days just until I settle > > in my new apartment and have my connection re-installed. I > > took the project to my final exams where people will also > > have the opportunity to learn more about Ubuntu, GNOME, > > Ubuntu GNOME and Linux in general. > > > > I hope you all will like it. > > -- > > Patrik Bubák > > Ubuntu GNOME Artwork team | Behance.net > > > > Sent using Evolution > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome > -- Patrik Bubák Ubuntu GNOME Artwork team | Behance.net Sent using Evolution
-- Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
