[Expired for corosync (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]

** Changed in: corosync (Ubuntu)
       Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
High Availability Team, which is subscribed to corosync in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768471

Title:
  corosync segfaults on startup joining another node

Status in corosync package in Ubuntu:
  Expired

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: corosync

  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu Apr 21 12:00:35 2011
  Dependencies:
    adduser 3.112ubuntu1
    base-files 5.0.0ubuntu20.10.04.3
    base-passwd 3.5.22
    coreutils 7.4-2ubuntu3
    debconf 1.5.28ubuntu4
    debconf-i18n 1.5.28ubuntu4
    debianutils 3.2.2
    dpkg 1.15.5.6ubuntu4.5
    findutils 4.4.2-1ubuntu1
    gcc-4.4-base 4.4.3-4ubuntu5
    libacl1 2.2.49-2
    libattr1 1:2.4.44-1
    libc-bin 2.11.1-0ubuntu7.8
    libc6 2.11.1-0ubuntu7.8
    libcorosync4 1.2.0-0ubuntu1
    libdb4.8 4.8.24-1ubuntu1
    libgcc1 1:4.4.3-4ubuntu5
    liblocale-gettext-perl 1.05-6
    libncurses5 5.7+20090803-2ubuntu3
    libnspr4-0d 4.8.6-0ubuntu0.10.04.2
    libnss3-1d 3.12.9+ckbi-1.82-0ubuntu0.10.04.1
    libpam-modules 1.1.1-2ubuntu5
    libpam0g 1.1.1-2ubuntu5
    libselinux1 2.0.89-4
    libsqlite3-0 3.6.22-1
    libstdc++6 4.4.3-4ubuntu5
    libtext-charwidth-perl 0.04-6
    libtext-iconv-perl 1.7-2
    libtext-wrapi18n-perl 0.06-7
    lsb-base 4.0-0ubuntu8
    lzma 4.43-14ubuntu2
    ncurses-bin 5.7+20090803-2ubuntu3
    passwd 1:4.1.4.2-1ubuntu2.2
    perl-base 5.10.1-8ubuntu2
    sed 4.2.1-6
    sensible-utils 0.0.1ubuntu3
    tzdata 2011e-0ubuntu0.10.04
    zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-15ubuntu1
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 
(20100427)
  Package: corosync 1.2.0-0ubuntu1
  PackageArchitecture: amd64
  ProblemType: Bug
  ProcEnviron:
    PATH=(custom, no user)
    LANG=en_US.UTF-8
    SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-30.59-server 2.6.32.29+drm33.13
  SourcePackage: corosync
  Tags: lucid
  Uname: Linux 2.6.32-30-server x86_64

  It will segfault with or without the other server online. Oddly, these are 
built on similar machines with essentially the exact same config throughout. 
The only difference is that I originally forgot to set the mtu to 9000 on this 
particular machine and therefore corosync failed to communicate initially. I 
brought it back up with the correct eth MTU and it started with segfaulting. 
I've tried cleaning up the machine and starting fresh with just the config, but 
that doesn't work either. I suspect this is cured in a newer package of 
corosync.
   
  corosync.conf:

  # Please read the corosync.conf.5 manual page

  totem {
        version: 2
        secauth: off
        threads: 0
        netmtu: 9000
        token: 3000
        token_retransmits_before_loss_const: 10
        join: 60
        consensus: 5000
        vsftype: none
        max_messages: 20
        clear_node_high_bit: yes
        interface {
                ringnumber: 0
                bindnetaddr: 10.24.98.0
                mcastaddr: 239.18.110.1
                mcastport: 4172
        }
  }

  logging {
        fileline: off
        to_stderr: yes
        to_logfile: no
        to_syslog: yes
        syslog_facility: daemon
        debug: on
        timestamp: on
        logger_subsys {
                subsys: AMF
                debug: on
        }
  }

  amf {
        mode: disabled
  }

  aisexec {
        user: root
        group: root
  }

  service {
        # Load the Pacemaker Cluster Resource Manager
        name: pacemaker
        ver: 0
  }

  daemon.log: attached

  I have the strace too, if it would help.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/768471/+subscriptions

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ha
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-ha
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to