On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Nitesh Mistry <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 08:11:36PM +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: >> But I also think this output is broken or probably the partitioning is >> actually broken. Check the blocks for sda2 and sda5. They are both >> same, which is ok of sda5 is the only logical partition. But then >> check how blocks for sda3 are between sda2 and sda5. > > Really? IIRC, blocks for sda3 are starting after sda2 and sda5. From the > look of it, its just showing up in between lines for sda2 and sda5. Either > that or I am really deprived of caffeine.
You are correct. My mistake. There doesn't seem to be problem. Looks like my mind was caught up on something and i couldn't read between lines (literally). :-) Onkar -- Passion - Some people climb mountains - others write Free software. Don't ask why - the reason is the same. -- ubuntu-in mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-in
