Thierry Carrez [2009-10-23 6:52 -0000]: > @Martin: > Matthias is still missing two pieces of information to make the good choice > on commons-cli: > 1/ Does eucalyptus show any regression when run with commons-cli 1.2 rather > than 1.1 ? (upstream analysis in progress, our testing reports its OK) > 2/ Does maven work well enough with 1.1 ? (it builds, does it run ?) > > If eucalyptus doesn't regress AND maven is unusable without 1.2, then we > should consider moving to 1.2 > IMO for any other combination we should just keep 1.1.
IMO, if 2 is true, we shouldn't even bother spending time to test 1. -- sync, merges and FFe's need for getting maven built https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Java Packaging, which is a direct subscriber. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-java Post to : ubuntu-java@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-java More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
