On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 10:35 +0100, Luke-Jennings wrote: > On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:04 -0400, Martin Owens wrote: > > For the Learning team: > > > > On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 14:48 -0400, Kyle Nitzsche wrote: > > > > What are the (current) required delivery formats by stakeholders. My > > > > guesses: > > > > * ubuntu-docs: mallard, xhtml, others? > > > > * ubuntu-manual: xhtml, pdf, others? > > > > ubuntu-learning-materials: pdf, svg, png, text and code files for > > publishing. Svg, asciidoc for editing. > > > > Martin, > > > ubuntu-manual > > A form of getting from the format of the content pool to latex files > *.tex to turn into pdf, png's. > > thats all I can think off hopefully i have not missed anything > > Luke > I have made a pro's and cons' list [1] for mallard and docbook as I think those are the main content pool options. I have also added the teams required formants. If each team can populate the pros and cons also add any more requirements at the bottom.
Hopefully then we can make a good well judged choice on the format in the meeting. Luke Jennings (jenkins on #freenode) [1] http://pad.ubuntu-uk.org/prosandcons _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-manual Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-manual More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
