Hi t u Actually with gobby it saves the the information of who did the edits, and as long as the documented is still in the gobby server you can access it and find out who wrote what. Granted it uses whatever name they gave to the gobby server, but it does also keep their ip etc. in the logs. So we can tell who wrote what,when and from where in gobby. - Eldo
t u wrote: > Corey Burger wrote: >> On 12/10/06, t u <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is it possible not to use gobby? It's just horribly hard to find out >>> what changed between pre-gobby and post-gobby changes. Have a look: >>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue24?action=diff&rev2=34&rev1=29 >>> >>> >>> The "show changes" feature of our wiki is really not useful (looks bad, >>> which means it's hard t ofigure out everything quickly). So I prefer to >>> check the changes via email alerts (which shows incremental changes like >>> patch files). >> Yes, Gobby makes things hard to see who did what. We also left 24 in >> gobby for a long time. The issue is that we need the collaborative >> real time editing for the UWN. Without it we it takes much much >> longer. >> >> Corey >> > Hi, > > Just to clarify, the reason I mentioned this now and not before is > because if too many [Turkish] people know about the news item on Kurdish > Ubuntu, this UWN will most probably be vandalized (I'm Turkish, I am > familiar with our sensitivities... ;) ) and I've been closely monitoring > it. > > So... with a gobby edit like this (so hard to verify what info survived > the edit), I almost dropped dead with an anxiety attack ;) > > Just clarifying, no need to reply :) > > Thanks -- ubuntu-marketing mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-marketing
