Salut ;-)
On 2/20/07, Lionel Porcheron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Julius Bloch a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >[...]
> >
> I tend to agree with Julius, gobby is realy easy and fun to use for
> colaborative edition (by collaborative, I mean at the same time). You do
> not need the "chat lock" ("I am editing the page"). I am one of the
> French translator, we tried wiki and gobby and we are happy gobby users
> for translation parties.
I'm not saying "gobby is not good", but rather: in this special case,
the wiki would imho be better.
> If I understood well, nowadays, the articles are submited via the wiki
> and the final "packaging" is done on gobby. This looks like a good
> solution to me. The "gobby" phase was a bit long this time due to
> unavailablity from members of the team. We can not blame them for that.
> Submiting articles by posting on this maling list is another solution.
This is a good idea, is there a person in charge of taking articles
from this list to gobby? The wiki-pages of uwn as they are now don't
give much information about how to submit articles. If we stick with
gobby, the wiki definitely need some changes in order that more people
can contribute.
> Concerning starting the translation before letter is published,
> regarding past experiences, it is not a good idea : UWN may change until
> it is published, so we (French translators) now wait the final publication.
Well, we (German translators) always start earlier, because if we
would start with the official release it would take too long to
translate - it's faster to fix changes (which are mostly minor ones)
than to wait.
So, a page with a copy from the actual gobby version is a "must".
Regards,
Mirjam
--
ubuntu-marketing mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-marketing
