> are you sure this example of yours makes sense? I mean, are you saying > that DRM happens because proprietary software exists? I am not sure I > follow you here. > Marco
Not to mention a blanket-statement like this is FUD that the Internet slams corporations for. DRM as a concept is not inherently bad. Its simply poor implementations we've seen up to this point and how its been co-opted by media conglomerates that force us as a community to paint it in a negative light. Someday, someone may actually get it right. In fact, the angle in this situation would be to promote FOSS as a possible savior of DRM by letting the community build something that works correctly and protects the rights of the users throughout the world (not just the US and the Fair Use clause). There is no need to vilify the opposition when they do a fine job smearing egg on their face without your help. Instead, I personally would opt to proclaim the limitless possibilities that exist in software that is free and open to the world, since that is a more positive approach in a world plagued with far too much cynicism. John -- ubuntu-marketing mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-marketing
