On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 09:23:21AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:29:45AM +0100, Daniel Holbach wrote: > > would you please consider the following Upstream Version Freeze > > exceptions discussed by the MOTUs: > > [...] > > * scim-tables (0.5.5 -> 0.5.6): improved cjk input > > (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ubuntu.motu/275) > > Is scim-tables scheduled for promotion to main with other scim components?
As this has gone unanswered for one week, and the scim-tables UVF exception is requested by me, even though all I can say is "I don't know", I figure I'd better say it aloud. :-) I was approached by HOU "freeflying" Zhengpeng (cc:ed him) early in the dapper development period about the main inclusion of SCIM related packages. I was not very interested and told him so, and I was busy working on getting various SCIM related package into shape at that time. Then at the end of January we had a talk again about this. I told him that due to the reluctance of upstream for supporting old releases and the long lifetime of dapper, I am not really confident to ask SCIM package for main inclusion at this stage (I am not familar with the codebase myself, therefore security fixes, if any, is going to be a problem). But he was very eager to get them into main for CJK support, so I decided to be impartial on this and told him to go ahead, but just don't expect my help. I am therefore not involved in the main inclusion processes of these SCIM packages, and haven't been contacted about this issue since that talk (altough I read around and know a little about the progress). Ming 2006.02.22 -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
