On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:50:38PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote: > Hi, Hi Stephan,
> On Saturday 11 November 2006 23:10, Daniel T. Chen wrote: > > Ming Hua wrote: > > > > > > I care about stable updates a lot, and while I am not confident to be in > > > the MOTU-SRU team, I would be happy to be in such a bug triaging team > > > and help what I can. Anybody with me? > > > > Ideally all MOTU would participate, but understandably there are > > resource constraints. I'm game for being on such a triaging team. > > Just another team with the same ppl in as in our other teams? In particularly this case, I am proposing to form and join a team to help another team (MOTU-SRU) that I am not in. So it would not be the same people in both teams in the first place. Daniel does belong to both teams though (if a second one is formed, of course). > I think this structure of teams will work if there are different ppl doing > different work. But the same ppl doing the same work (and what is different > from bug triaging for normal motu bugs, then triaging bugs for sru bugs?) I understand your argument of reducing unnecessary infrastructures. But I still believe a triage team for SRUed packages is necessary. Let's face it: it's just not realistic to ask every MOTU/hopeful to look at all bugs in universe. I was subscribed to -universe-bugs list for a few months, couldn't keep up with the traffic and ended up doing nothing useful. Ming 2006.11.12 -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
