Hi, Am Donnerstag 18 Januar 2007 08:05 schrieb Tollef Fog Heen: > Stefan Potyra skrev: > > However I'm still not entirely convinced, that the whole process for > > universe SRU's is optimal yet. There are also some high delays between > > the first debdiff and three acks from motu-sru, which might be another > > place to fix the process. > > How often does it happen that a MOTU/Hopeful gets a fix turned down and > has to start again? If it nearly never happens, the "three acks" might > a bit over the top and we could reduce it to one.
I've just done a quick check about this: first debdiff goes in unmodifed: 12 first debdiff goes in unmodified, but there is a discussion between motu-sru members first: 3 first debdiff gets a reject from one of motu-sru: 7 > > > Imho Jordan made a pretty good proposal, though this would kinda imply > > that the remove-from-non-release-pockets bug is fixed. What do you think > > of it? > > See my reply to your reply to his mail. All in all, not too bad, but > this is not a black or white situation, we can choose any shade of brown > in between. I don't think getting rid of all checks is what we should > move to, but if you (the MOTUs) are unhappy with the current situation, > we need to fix it. Yes, big thanks for your input on this. Inorder to collect the proposals/discussions in one place, I've created a wiki-page for that: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Processes/SRURedone It's a bit sparse right now, so everyone please add your comments/proposals there. We can then have a further discussion and/or decision on the upcoming motu-meeting. Cheers, Stefan.
pgp5dawQ7N6sV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
