I am one of SOAPpy upstream. Luke Yelavich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all > I am looking into packaging jack_mixer, requested by the upstream > developer on IRC. One of its dependancies is the fpconst module. > > As it happens, fpconst can be found in the python-soappy package, which > ahs nothing at all to do with jack_mixer, which is an audio application. > > I am wondering where we go from here. Do we separate out fpconst as a > separate package, and have python-soappy depend on that, or should I > place a copy of fpconst in with the new jack_mixer package?
2007/1/30, Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Looking at bugs like > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=379113, I'd say it > makes much sense to have a separate python-fpconst package. I wonder if > it makes sense to make the python-soappy package provide the extra > binary package, or if it should go out of python-soappy and create a > new source package. fpconst is maintained outside of SOAPpy, and is useful in itself. Therefore, fpconst should be its own source package as well as a separate binary package. Correct upstream URL for fpconst would be SourceForge's RSOAP project, as new release tarballs (well, they are far between) are posted to its download area. http://sourceforge.net/projects/rsoap -- Seo Sanghyeon -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
