Hi Rocco, On Sunday 25 February 2007 05:51:03 Rocco Stanzione wrote: > Thus spake Stefan Potyra: > > > > If noone shouts, I'll upload both tomorrow night, so if you have > > objections please raise them now. > > It's my opinion that we should respect the project's wishes and remove 0.3. > If that's just too much, can we call the stable version "supertux" and the > unstable version "supertux-unstable", so that if I apt-get install supertux > I don't inadvertently get a crashy package that damages the reputation of > the upstream project?
I've been thinking about this as well, however since we have 0.3 in backports, that would mean that everyone who installed the newer version from backports will get a downgraded version of supertux once he dist-upgrades to feisty, which I guess is not what these people want. As a side note, the descriptions of supertux has been modified to show that it's the unstable development version, also pointing to supertux-stable for a stable gaming experience. Cheers, Stefan.
pgpbZvEQ1YjaJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
