On Wednesday 07 March 2007 23:28:28 Daniel T. Chen wrote: > I agree with Daniel's points that we should be more cautious regarding > policy decisions, but I think it's in our [MOTU] best interest to make > as much of the decision process open, transparent and responsive to MOTU > as possible. From my perspective, MC's charter is to lead MOTU, not > restrict policy decisions to only MC [the exception being approving or > deferring MOTU candidates].
Yes, sounds pretty sane.
I especially like the idea of a charter for MC.
I've just started an early draft of a charter for MC [1], please
correct/add/comment on it. Please also state if you think we don't need a
charter ;).
Cheers,
Stefan.
--
[1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Council/Charter
pgpaQHr5JO6h7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
