On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:02:04AM +0100, Stefan Potyra wrote: > Do I get it right that you ask for an UVF exception for NEW packages (rather > than for updates)?
Both. > What do you think will be the major gain from putting these into universe > instead of e.g. using an alternate repository? So they are available to everyone, and so I don't have to build them on multiple architectures. > Do you think the kubuntu team will be able to support these packages post > feisty e.g. via SRUs? No > Also reading from the spec that configuration files will be in .kde4 won't be > migrated to .kde once KDE4 is in place makes me a little bit sceptical about > the general upgrade path post feisty. Can you elaborate on this a little bit? Since they're unstable and pre-beta there is no upgrade path for user settings. Jonathan -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
