Sorry for the first more confusing post, here is a clear example and the long version of it all:
Just to make it clear on my part, this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/102406 is in the debian mentors system at the moment and is sitting there for review. So, if I'm looking through my needs packaging list https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.searchtext=&orderby=-importance&field.status%3Alist=New&field.status%3Alist=Incomplete&field.status%3Alist=Confirmed&field.status%3Alist=Triaged&field.status%3Alist=In+Progress&field.status%3Alist=Fix+Committed&assignee_option=any&field.assignee=&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_contact=&field.component-empty-marker=1&field.status_upstream-empty-marker=1&field.omit_dupes.used=&field.omit_dupes=on&field.has_patch.used=&field.tag=needs-packaging&field.has_cve.used=&field.has_no_package.used=&search=Search&start=75 Looking for a package, I would not like to see this bug, because it's already being worked on: the package is already there, it just needs a sponsor. I first thought people where just lazy and didn't mark it as "In Progress", so I did. However, when I came across a second package with similar problems, I started to wonder if I did the right thing. What should be the status of a bug like this, should I change it back and if so, what is the right way of filtering these bugs out of my list? With kind regards, Bram PS As Siegfried and Scott posted: I've added the WNPP to the "+Distribution" on the Warzone 2100 bug, but I still would like some more information on this. On 7/28/07, Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think if there is a WNPP bug it should be linked like any other Debian > bug and then people will be able to see the status themselves. > > Scott K > -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
