On Thursday 18 October 2007 22:40, Emmet Hikory wrote: ... > For the latter, extended promotion of teams and bug tags may be > valueable. I'm not deeply familar with backport and update > procedures, but I suspect that the backport testers team bug list (2) > is likely a good list of backports that need testing... ... > 2: https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-backports-testers/
Depending on which release you are running, you can look at it this way too: https://bugs.launchpad.net/feisty-backports/+bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/edgy-backports/+bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/dapper-backports/+bugs The standards for backports testing is a fairly simple builds, installs, runs. If packages have a lot of reverse depencies then more complex testing may be required. More information here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports Building and testing backports is not a bad way to get started if one is interested in becoming invovled in Ubuntu development. It gets you started dealing with some of the basic tools and actions a MOTU needs to know. More testers always wanted. Scott K -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
