Hi Emmet, Am Sonntag 04 November 2007 15:53:39 schrieb Emmet Hikory: > Am 11/4/07, schreib Stefan Potyra: > > Am Freitag 02 November 2007 14:27:42 schrieb Jeffrey Ratcliffe: > > [..] > > > > > The order of the packages on REVU seems to be semi-random. > > > > [..] > > > > It's not semi-random, but rather mainly based on activity (iirc, number > > of comments, number of advocations play a role in the order). The formula > > to calculate the order of displayed packages however is quite obscure, > > and I'm happy to change it to something more reasonable. What do you > > think about using FIFO (oldest first)? Other suggestions? > > I'd like something a little more complex:
grml... the current sql query is already very complex *g*.
>
> First:
> Oldest-first list of packages where there is at least one
> advocation, and any comments after the advocation are by the uploader.
>
> Second:
> Oldest-first list of packages where any comments since the last
> upload are by the uploader.
>
> Third:
> Oldest-first list of all remaining packages
>
> The reasoning is that the first batch is highest priority: likely
> being packages that are ready to be sponsored into the archive. The
> second batch is next most important, likely being packages that seek a
> first advocate, and need review. The third batch is last, likely
> representing rejections or requests for rework, and so not requiring
> immediate attention.
That would mean that completely new uploads fall in the third catagory and
would end up pretty much at the bottom... is this intended?
Cheers,
Stefan.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
