On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 07:55 +0100, Gauvain Pocentek wrote: > Thanks for your efforts but could you please have a look at what's the > bug report before tagging it 'bitesize'? > > Bug #163206 for instance is *not* a bitesize bug.
Indeed, some of the bugs don't exactly qualify as "bitesize", but then they probably shouldn't be (or have been) tagged "ubuntulove" either. It's not been clearly described anywhere what "ubuntulove" is, and how it's different from "bitesize", and it hasn't been utilized in quite a while, and apparently the consensus is to phase it out. Since you re-tagged the bug as "ubuntulove", do you have an objection to this? I'll go through the list to check for other bugs that aren't "bitesize". Sorry for not doing it properly beforehand, due to time constraints. m. -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
