Would help if i sent it from a subscribed address, too... On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:42:57 +1100, "Hobbsee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:05:18 -0500, "Scott Kitterman" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Up through Alpha 6, if a MOTU believes upload of a new upstream release > > that just has bug fixes in it is warranted, they may upload it. > > I think this is a good idea. > > > File a bug in LP with the upstream change log entries in it and mark it > > fix released when the upload is done to document that it was bug fix only. > > I see this as a lot of red tape, and I don't think it entirely solves > the problem. > > I think it would be more helpful to implement a strategy, and encourage > people, to think about the feasibility > of their uploads at the time of them signing them. This would help > people at any time of the cycle, not just during feature freeze. > As for the best way to get this kind of culture...that can be figured > out by those who *aren't* currently on vacation. > > Hobbsee > (still on vacation until Wednesday) > -- > Hobbsee > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Hobbsee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
