On Wednesday 16 April 2008 09:51, Daniel Holbach wrote: > Scott Kitterman schrieb: > > On Wednesday 16 April 2008 08:15, Daniel Holbach wrote: > >> I personally ask and have seen others actively asking for changes to > >> patches if they were not ready to go yet. (Be it packaging problems, > >> policy problems or not adhering to processes.) > > > > So the frustration gets pushed from the New package process into bug > > fixing if we end up with more of this. I think that's the LAST thing we > > want. > > What I said was in reply to the point that education happens less in the > sponsoring process, which I disagree with. > > If a package is not ready, it's not ready. If there are mistakes that > were overlooked (or things that could be improved) it's more likely to > get fixed once it's in the archive and bug fixing is "open for all". > > > Currently I think we are expending not nearly enough effort on > > maintaining what we have and really need to make that easier/smoother. > > We could move this out into a separate thread and discuss concrete > problems and solutions for them for Intrepid. > Fine, when I've got some ideas I'll bring it up, but for this thread, I think uploading less reveiwed packages is definitely a stop in the wrong direction.
Scott K -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
