2008/4/16, Stefan Potyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > hm... that's tough. Well, there is lintian, but not all of lintian output is > always correct for each source package (that's why you can override parts of > it). So the tricky part here is: What to do with the result of a package > checker? (should it reject the package, which would be wrong for some, should > it leave a negative reviewing comment, same problem, or should it just be > informational, which is what we have right now, though not really presented > very nicely).
I'm thinking about adding a "Automatic checks have detected X problems with this package." message (linking to lintian's result) on the top of the details.py page (in a rectangular box like those in Launchpad). Do you think this would help raise awareness about those problems? -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
