I still like Ubuntu Contributing Developers and not just because it's appropriately corporate sounding. Here are my reasons:
1. It is self describing. It's a team for people who have contributed to Ubuntu. We even say "Thank you for your contribution to Ubuntu". 2. Membership is about significant and sustained contribution. I think it's good to have this in the name. 3. It parallels other uses in English. A "Contributing Editor" in the newspaper business, is someone who is a newer editor that is still learning the trade. 4. Because of the above, it's easy to explain. 5. It shouldn't be controversial, so we can just do it and move on. To argue against "Hacker" options, in addition to the obvious connotation issue, I completely agree with Jordan Mantha's about this team being about packaging and not about programming. That only deepens the connotation problem. Scott K -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
