On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Stefan Potyra < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks, > > now that hardy is out, and intrepid is still closed, it would be a perfect > time to get going with SRUs for hardy. > > Currently, SRU's [1] have the requirement to be fixed in the development > version first. The main use for this is, to not introduce regressions by > forgetting to fix the development version. Of course we cannot do this > right > now. > > So here's my straw-man's plan to get going: Fix stuff in SRU's and drop the > current requirement to have intrepid fixed first, until intrepid actually > opens. Tag each upgrade, which gets accepted by the SRU team > with "needs-fix-intrepid", so that we can later apply the fix for intrepid > as > well. > > What do you think? More important, motu-sru: is that OK for you? > Sound great. +1 from me. One possible question would be if we should go a bit beyond just opening of Intrepid. Often the archives are generally ready for large scale work for a few weeks after the archives are open, like after UDS. -Jordan
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
