As of Tuesday, Wine made its first release, 1.0. Unlike most Wine releases, 1.0 came after a 6 week code freeze and a lot of regression testing. Over 100 bugs have been closed on Wine's bugzilla, and about 10 or so on launchpad are solved by Wine 1.0 (eg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236589, https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236106, https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216235)
Since Hardy currently offers a beta version (0.59), which may have some regressions since Gutsy, I think our users would be best served by pushing out Wine 1.0 through hardy-updates as opposed to hardy-backports, much like FireFox 3 was. Aside from getting the bugfixes to more people, there are other advantages as well, such as giving third parties a stable version of Wine to target. Any thoughts on this? I'm not sure which bug to mark for the SRU process, as there's so many to choose from, but I thought I would start this up on the mailing list here as Wine 1.0 is a bit different from a normal SRU (though not much different from FireFox). Thanks, Scott Ritchie -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
