On Tuesday 24 June 2008 13:41, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I think I have a sense of it. I'll work up a diff and run it by the other > members of motu-sru, ubuntu-sru, and the sru-verification teams. > > Scott K
As promised, here is the diff I propose. I'd appreciate concurrence from members of the above teams. Comments from anyone are welcome too. --- sru 2008-06-24 22:15:10.000000000 -0400 +++ sru.new 2008-06-24 22:17:59.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -The [WWW] SRU verification team will regularly check open bugs with the verification-needed tag and test proposed updates on different hardware to check for inadvertent side effects. +The [WWW] SRU verification team will regularly check open bugs with the verification-needed tag and test proposed updates on different hardware to check for inadvertent side effects. Verification must be done in a software environment as close as is feasible to that which will exist after the package is copied to *-updates for. Generally this will be with a system that is up to date from *-release, *-security, and *-updates, but not other packages from *-proposed. If they discover that your fix is insufficient, or the test case is not sufficient to reproduce the bug, they will: If there are no objections from the relevant teams, I'll update the wiki page with a suitably wikified version of this. Scott K -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
