Hi, first off, I'm happy that all motu-release members are ok to go for intrepid as well. Imho it was a good working team during hardy, and has fulfilled its purpose well.
Nonetheless, I believe it's also important to look at things that didn't go so well, and I'd like to start this with some personal observations regarding members of motu-release. Please don't get me wrong here, I don't want to flame anyone here, as I believe all motu-release members did a great job, but it's imho important to also point out what still could be improved. Everyone please also post your observerations in regards to motu-release in this thread. So, that's what I've been observing: Imho the most driving force of motu-release was Scott, thanks a lot! We wouldn't have managed the release without you. Cesare also did a good job at working through motu-release bugs, though sometimes he was lacking activity. (not too sure why, my guess is that Cesare felt he couldn't make a decisions for some packages. Hey the worst decision is to not make one, and have FFe requests unanswered ;)) Sarah, while having great skills and knowledge, I've seen rarely activity in regards to motu-release/FFe's. Luke, the same I wrote in regards to Sarah applies as well. So my question still stands: what do we do with motu-release for intrepid. Subquestions are: what do you (members of motu-release) would like to add, what did you observer generally in regards to motu-release, what to improve? Finally, would anyone new like to apply for motu-relase, and what would he/she think to add to the team? Cheers, Stefan.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
