Hi all,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> First draft for a policy for motu-{sru,release} membership:Sorry for the long delay. I've had a look again at the proposal and at the comments, let's see if I can summarise them. > 0/ The term of service for the motu-sru and motu-release teams is of one > release > cycle (six months). It's been said this is too short, and that 1 or 2 years would be better. It's also been proposed that we could have a long term (e.g. 2 years) but with "pings" from time to time (e.g. 6 months) to see who is not active and then replace inactive members. That way you don't change the entire team at the same time. I personally think 2 years is too much, but one year would be fine with me. And I don't think there will be problems regarding to changing the entire teams, as I expect some of the old members to reapply and be re-elected. > > 1/ When the nominating time starts, people may nominate themselves (with a > mail > to ubuntu-motu@). There's no restriction as to how many terms someone can > participate, but they need to reapply after each term ends. > > 2/ When the nominating time ends, assuming there's any (even just 1, (s)he may > be rejected) candidature, the MC sets the polls in Launchpad (yes, it has a > poor > interface, we need to file bugs if there aren't yet...), and the MOTU team is > given a week to vote. > > 3/ The MC adds the accepted candidates to the appropriate teams. > > 4/ If all the vacancies haven't been fulfilled, another call for members may > be > done, after a time of one week. > > > Things that aren't clear yet in that draft: > - When the nomination period starts for each team (one week after the release > for motu-release and just after FeatureFreeze for motu-sru?). > - How the voting works. Emilio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
