That sounds pretty fair to me. It was just an idea, but now thinking it better and reading this arguments i'm convinced it's not a good one :D Thank you for your time and responses.
On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 14:01 +0900, Emmet Hikory wrote: > Nicolas Valcarcel wrote: > > Now that we have the uuc team up and running, wouldn't it be a > > good idea that uuc members can ACK sync requests, since they are > > supposed to be experienced contributors and should be capable to make > > sync requests by their own? > > No. There is little difference between a manual upload and a > sync, other than the mechanism by which the changes come to the > repository, and as such the same criteria for determining whether > someone can upload to the archive ought be applied. As there is no > technical review involved in an application to UUC, there is no > certain knowledge that any given applicant has the necessary technical > skills to be trusted with a sync request (or indeed, any sort of > upload). > > Rather than change the permission structure of uploads, I'd rather > encourage those that have the requisite technical skills to apply for > MOTU: that results in review by both current MOTU and MOTU Council > review, and is likely to help identify those who ought be able to > commit to the archive directly. > > -- > Emmet HIKORY > -- aka nxvl Peruvian LoCo Team Key fingerprint = BCE4 27A0 D03E 55DE DA2D BE06 891D 8DEE 6545 97FE gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 654597FE
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
