On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 02:08:13AM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote: > - - MOTU Team Elections > * Persia's proposal was discussed, and voted on, passing a majority > vote in favor those whose where there > - The general points are as follows > * To join the team, you nomination yourself, and need two > sponsorship requests. the floor is opened to -motu for anyone to post > criticisms. Any valid criticisms that are not retracted or resolved > invalidates that member from joining the team > * Any MOTU can request the resignation of someone on > - -sru/-release, which can be brought up on the list and discussed. If > the issues can't be resolved, the MC will have to resolve it
Regarding this, what would be a sane reason to do this, despite personal and social problems? I think we never had the case, that if someone has no time anymore, that he/she was glueing his/her bum on the chair for those teams? So, IMHO the only reason which can force such a thing is a personal quarrel or a social problem between the requesting motu and the motu in question? If I understand this proposition totally wrong, please enlighten me :) \sh -- Stephan '\sh' Hermann | OSS Developer & Systemadministrator JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.sourcecode.de/ GPG ID: 0xC098EFA8 | http://leonov.tv/ 3D8B 5138 0852 DA7A B83F DCCB C189 E733 C098 EFA8 -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
