On Saturday 06 September 2008 14:25, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Hi all, > > Scott Kitterman wrote: > > It has seemed to me for some time that making decisions about process and > > policy changes at MOTU meetings based on votes of those present is not > > serving us particularly well. The major problems with the current > > system, as I see it are: > > > > 1. Not very many MOTU at the meeting, so a vote may or may not represent > > the will of the larger body of MOTU (due to time zone spread it is not > > practical to expect everyone to be able to make every meeting). > > > > 2. Due to this risk, MOTU present at a meeting are often unwilling to > > make a decision on controversial issues. > > > > So we tend to get decisions on easy topics and not on hard ones. > > > > I'd like to propose an alternative approach based on the IETF rough > > consensus model. There are two major features I'd like to bring foward > > from this model for MOTU: > > [...] > > > FWIW, I'll add this to the agenda for the next meeting. > > Has this already been adopted? If so, is it documented somewhere? If not, > has it been rejected or has the discussion just died or...? > > FTR, I'm in favour of the proposal. >
It was adopted. Documenting it is somewhere lost on my TODO list. Scott K -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
